Last weekend was raced the first Formula One Grand Prix of the season, Ecclestone, in another display of unconsciousness and despotism has revived a shift in the rules. The provision, as always, the show precedence over any predetermined order or competitive structure (as exists in other sports-related motor).
The new rules require much time and space for reflection, it is not my purpose to analyze in depth so it is best to consult a good reference page.
The GP of Australia is held in a special circuit with very marked peculiarities often make it a touchdown or a space for the show rather than a touchstone or a good model in which to measure the potential of each one, for that, they say to wait to Malaysia-chronologically placed second or third in the calendar in recent years.
La sensación general del público medio es de decepción mientras que la opinión de algún especialista puede parecer contraria, existe hasta fascinación por la nueva guerra de estrategias que abren los neumáticos Pirelli. Ambas visiones se acaban fusionando en una atmósfera agnóstica en la que me encuentro yo.
Podemos destacar aspectos positivos como the variety of pit stop strategies and how they were all relatively valid and successful when implemented properly. Vettel and Hamilton dominated the event with a priori Tática was more effective (2 arrests in the box). Alonso, for example, used his pace to go back in three changes of wheels and even a third way was triumphant, with his Sauber Sergio Perez stopped only once to achieve a brilliant result after the FIA \u200b\u200btook away for reasons unrelated to Use of the gums.
In turn, we saw more overtaking than it is usually customary, or at least were more favorable. Despite not been a revolution adjustable rear spoiler (DRS), there is optimism about the next race, where the main line is longer and is accompanied by heavy braking-which did not happen in Australia for a poor choice of trigger point device.
In contrast to these expectations, there are voices in the paddock who have observed that the wear Pirelli will not be increasing as the temperature rises quite the contrary, they think which tend to be more stable, which would take us back to the strategic oasis after the ban on pit stops, bad thing.
As it introduced to encourage overtaking, doubts about mobile wing will emerge even Charlie Whiting who, like everyone else, expected to show the purpose Sepang had before, if not, review the rule.
Finally, in relation to the above we must talk about equality. On Saturday afternoon it was learned that Red Bull did not ride the KERS, only one small only for output that did not compromise the reliability or the fast car through the corners of Austria. With this news it was thought that they could suffer in the race despite the proficiency they showed in qualifying but did not. Only defective chassis avoided a double of energy drinks. Suspecting that in future circuits the importance of the absence of KERS will be higher with longer straights, Horner and Marko have already jumped to assert that his car mounted the system of conventional kinetic energy recovery in Malaysia, thus laying any land outside the weakness of current world champions. They think they can be even faster.
Joining this the proper care of gums suffered by the car of Vettel in Australia-even over the Ferrari, 'celebrities' exactly in this section, "the thrill of competition can be very committed to this course. If we remove from the equation mechanical problems Newey machine had last season, we can address an inequality that will help rather little to keep the audience watching television. The feeling is that the season past is not over, that we are in an extension of the Red Bull technical review began two years ago.
I can espabilar arrows silver and red bullets greatly, with metaphors of this style and flashy promos not going to win the championship.
0 comments:
Post a Comment